Terms the top 10 share for “ai for coding”
Someone ran “ai for coding” through our Top 10 Term Finder, so we kept the result. Below are the words and phrases the ranking pages had in common that day, and how many of them used each one.
The shared terms
| Term | Pages using it | Share | Total mentions |
|---|---|---|---|
| code quality | 6/8 | 75% | 26 |
| codebase | 6/8 | 75% | 31 |
| codebases | 5/8 | 63% | 26 |
| code coding | 5/8 | 63% | 8 |
| generated code | 5/8 | 63% | 7 |
| deployment | 6/8 | 75% | 33 |
| debugging | 6/8 | 75% | 24 |
| coding tools | 5/8 | 63% | 31 |
| ides | 5/8 | 63% | 16 |
| code generation | 4/8 | 50% | 54 |
| ide | 4/8 | 50% | 33 |
| aws | 4/8 | 50% | 32 |
| coding tool | 4/8 | 50% | 26 |
| coding assistants | 4/8 | 50% | 24 |
| code completion | 4/8 | 50% | 19 |
| amazon developer | 4/8 | 50% | 16 |
| refactoring | 4/8 | 50% | 15 |
| dependencies | 4/8 | 50% | 12 |
| large codebases | 4/8 | 50% | 11 |
| code assistant | 4/8 | 50% | 9 |
| development teams | 4/8 | 50% | 7 |
| repositories | 4/8 | 50% | 7 |
| code snippets | 4/8 | 50% | 5 |
| programmer | 4/8 | 50% | 5 |
| vulnerabilities | 4/8 | 50% | 5 |
| pair programmer | 4/8 | 50% | 4 |
| architecture | 6/8 | 75% | 19 |
| developer | 6/8 | 75% | 39 |
| production | 6/8 | 75% | 18 |
| completion | 4/8 | 50% | 19 |
← swipe the table sideways for the rest of the columns
Single words and two-word phrases, stopwords removed. A term is listed only when at least two pages use it. Order comes from how many pages share the term, weighted so that common filler does not outrank the specific language of the topic.
The pages this came from
- 1reddit.comno readable text
- 2zapier.com28,441 chars
- 3deepai.org1,594 chars
- 4augmentcode.com39,568 chars
- 5figma.com30,438 chars
- 6axify.io42,792 chars
- 7aws.amazon.com12,130 chars
- 8youtube.com38,147 chars
- 9about.gitlab.com13,461 chars
Where these numbers come from
We asked Google (country us, language en) for “ai for coding” on 2026-08-20, took the top 10 organic results, and read the body text of each. 8 of them returned enough text to count; the rest are listed above so you can see what the sample left out. Counting is per page, not per mention, so one page repeating a phrase forty times still counts once.
This describes what ranks. It is not a recipe. Covering these terms will not lift a page, but missing all of them usually means the page is about something else. The full methodology has the rest.
Tools that produce a list like this
Commercial content tools build the same kind of list, usually with a score attached. We test them against this ground truth and publish what the numbers say.
- NeuronWriter — A weighted term list and a SERP that tracks Google's closely, under a content score that did not predict rank in our sample.
Side by side on the comparison table.
Run it on your own keyword
The Term Finder is free and needs no account. Five lookups a day, results cached for 30 days.