Terms the top 10 share for “best ai writing tools”
Someone ran “best ai writing tools” through our Top 10 Term Finder, so we kept the result. Below are the words and phrases the ranking pages had in common that day, and how many of them used each one.
The shared terms
| Term | Pages using it | Share | Total mentions |
|---|---|---|---|
| marketing copy | 7/7 | 100% | 21 |
| jasper | 7/7 | 100% | 86 |
| writing tool | 7/7 | 100% | 50 |
| sudowrite | 6/7 | 86% | 65 |
| writesonic | 6/7 | 86% | 52 |
| blog posts | 7/7 | 100% | 25 |
| quality output | 4/7 | 57% | 4 |
| long-form | 6/7 | 86% | 20 |
| generators | 6/7 | 86% | 27 |
| references | 6/7 | 86% | 6 |
| writing software | 5/7 | 71% | 27 |
| seo | 7/7 | 100% | 93 |
| gpt | 6/7 | 86% | 12 |
| readers | 6/7 | 86% | 12 |
| genuinely | 6/7 | 86% | 14 |
| paid plans | 6/7 | 86% | 10 |
| writing assistant | 6/7 | 86% | 10 |
| frase | 5/7 | 71% | 27 |
| short-form | 5/7 | 71% | 11 |
| intro | 5/7 | 71% | 5 |
| generic | 6/7 | 86% | 23 |
| toward | 6/7 | 86% | 8 |
| muse | 4/7 | 57% | 14 |
| fiction writers | 4/7 | 57% | 6 |
| staring blank | 4/7 | 57% | 6 |
| writers | 7/7 | 100% | 79 |
| drafts | 7/7 | 100% | 32 |
| worth | 7/7 | 100% | 22 |
| reading | 7/7 | 100% | 7 |
| fiction | 5/7 | 71% | 66 |
← swipe the table sideways for the rest of the columns
Single words and two-word phrases, stopwords removed. A term is listed only when at least two pages use it. Order comes from how many pages share the term, weighted so that common filler does not outrank the specific language of the topic.
The pages this came from
- 1reddit.comno readable text
- 2ilampadmanabhan.medium.com27,138 chars
- 3kindlepreneur.com38,794 chars
- 4aimadesimple0.substack.com20,843 chars
- 5clearscope.io28,335 chars
- 6rivalflow.com33,996 chars
- 7creativindie.com66,778 chars
- 8quora.comno readable text
- 9zapier.com63,905 chars
Where these numbers come from
We asked Google (country us, language en) for “best ai writing tools” on 2026-08-20, took the top 10 organic results, and read the body text of each. 7 of them returned enough text to count; the rest are listed above so you can see what the sample left out. Counting is per page, not per mention, so one page repeating a phrase forty times still counts once.
This describes what ranks. It is not a recipe. Covering these terms will not lift a page, but missing all of them usually means the page is about something else. The full methodology has the rest.
Tools that produce a list like this
Commercial content tools build the same kind of list, usually with a score attached. We test them against this ground truth and publish what the numbers say.
- NeuronWriter — A weighted term list and a SERP that tracks Google's closely, under a content score that did not predict rank in our sample.
Side by side on the comparison table.
Run it on your own keyword
The Term Finder is free and needs no account. Five lookups a day, results cached for 30 days.